Thursday, July 21, 2011

IF THE GULF DISASTER WASN’T PLANNED, HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN ROBERT KALUZA?



IF THE GULF DISASTER WASN’T PLANNED,
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN
ROBERT KALUZA?

I just have questions. I don’t know any more than you do why it happened. I just have questions. Take a look at the evidence and see if it makes any sense to you.

When you look at the moves made by the parties involved before the Deepwater Horizon disaster, it points to prior knowledge.  

We know Tony Hayward dumped one third of his stock in BP weeks before the rig blew.


We know that Goldman Sachs, notorious crooks, sold $250 million dollars worth of their BP stock.


Halliburton’s acquisition of the oil clean up company Boots and Coots just days before is a big red flag.




So, we know The Powers That Be knew there was going to be a problem. The question must be asked, why would they take the risks they were taking when they knew there was a problem?

Why did they spend hundreds of millions of dollars betting there would be a problem, but not spend 500 grand to try to stop it from happening?





Why would they take their best deepwater drilling operator off the rig during such a crucial time? Why would company men like Donald Vedrine and Robert Kaluza not follow proper procedure?


Kaluza had NO deepwater drilling experience, yet he was in charge of one of the most dangerous deepwater drilling operations in history. Why would he take these chances?


We know the Schlumberger crew in charge of safety flew off the rig that morning. Could it be they knew what was going to happen and flew to safety?


Are we to believe BP knew there was a problem with the rig and then decided to put some irresponsible hothead in charge?



Of course, Kaluza refused to testify.


To make matters worse, the Senate blocked a real investigation.


The Coast Guard was working for BP.





I know there are those who would argue how much this has damaged BP, but has it really?

We know BP has already received a HUGE tax credit for their mess, so it didn’t hurt them as bad as it appeared.


 We know BP was the first company to start drilling in the Gulf again.


In fact, the minute they “capped the well” the tax payers took over the liability for the clean up costs. BP was let off the hook.


Ian Crane made a great presentation on the Gulf disaster in Stockholm. He is a former oil executive and connected many of the dots.




This Facebook page is dedicated to trying to expose Robert Kaluza and his role in the disaster. I'd post a picture of him, but his face has been wiped off the web.



As a Gulf Coast resident, I’d like to know why my home was poisoned. I think Robert Kaluza is the smoking gun and best way to get to the truth. I don’t buy that he made those decisions on his own.

Who told him to be so reckless and why?